For my fourth post, I decided to somewhat compare two articles,
one being from Time Magazine, written by Alice Park, about the benefits of stem
cells in curing diseases. The other article, titled: “The Science and Ethics of
Induced Pluripotency: What Will Become of Embryonic Stem Cells?”, written by David
Zacharias and Timothy Nelson, discussed new concerns related to how embryonic stem
research could progress.
The Time Magazine article explains just how stem cells are
transforming the ways in which we will treat diseases as well as how we age. (This
is a regenerative use I never came across in other sources regarding stem
cells). Nonetheless, the article goes on to emphasize that disease doesn’t have
to be mysterious anymore with this new technology at our fingertips; instead,
as a society, we should be supporting stem cell research as much as possible.
Diseases related to brain cell, liver cell, heart cell, and nerve cell damage, are mentioned as being the most curable, using embryonic stem cells. This article doesn’t weigh into any issues surrounding this research, just more
of a personal opinion on the potentials of it.
http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20060807,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20060807,00.html
The second article, “The Science and Ethics of Induced
Pluripotency: What Will Become of Embryonic Stem Cells?” depicts just how
beneficial embryonic stem cells may or may not be as we come closer to new
advancements in regenerative technology. There have been promising results in the
treatment of Parkinson disease, spinal injuries, type 1 diabetes and
cardiovascular disease using embryonic stem cells. The article acknowledges
that the potential uses of stem cells, especially embryonic, have not yet been
realized. This article also discussed how experts must compare the social,
legal, scientific, and medical pros and cons, regarding stem cells as well.
The tone of the Time Magazine article, compared to the other
source, had much more of a biased tone. All of the EBSCOhost sources draw out
just how embryonic stem cells work, their potential for curing diseases, and
the controversies that go along with this research. However they let the
reader come to their own conclusions about this issue, instead of trying to
sway them one way or the other, like I felt the Time Magazine article did. They
are less opinion based and more academically supported. That’s not to say the
Time article was not a good source, because it did justice in giving more insight
on this topic, yet opinions were still able to make their way into the writing.
I feel the article written by Zacharias has a lot of optimism incorporated,
from a research standpoint, in just how far this new form of medicine can go if given the chance. Park’s article on the other hand, seems to be driven by a
personal “hype” over the disease curing potentials of this new medicine. I
think this is something that should be avoided so that limitations, at this
point, are not overlooked and achievable goals are in place before moving
forward.
Although I do believe that research in this area should be
done in order to pursue curing many diseases, I think only time will tell in
just how successful this new form of medicine will be. I also must agree with
Zacharias when he says “ethicality of embryo destruction appears unlikely.” I
feel like a broken record when I say that the ethics concerning this topic are
inconclusive and it is hard to say if embryonic stem cell research will ever be
socially accepted. However I feel that by shedding a light on medical, legal and
social benefits, we will see much more acceptance in the advancement of
regenerative medicine.
Works Cited
C. Christopher Hook, et al. "The Science And Ethics Of
Induced Pluripotency: What Will Become Of Embryonic Stem Cells?." Mayo
Clinic Proceedings 86.7 (2011): 634-640. Academic Search Premier.
Web. 17 July 2012.
Park, Alice. "How Stem Cells Are Changing the Way We
Think About Disease - 10 Ideas That Will Change the World - TIME." Breaking
News, Analysis, Politics, Blogs, News Photos, Video, Tech Reviews - TIME.com.
N.p., n.d. Web. 17 July 2012.
<http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/>
No comments:
Post a Comment